Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
Mr Briggs is in a minimally conscious state and his family has requested that his life-sustaining treatment be withdrawn. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:17 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: More secret justice on the horizon Angus McCullough QC special advocate for Russian cleared of spying in deportation case Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play 9/11 ten years on Even more secret evidence for government in Al Rawi case Mutual confidentiality between intelligence services trumped by open justice requirements [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
It's an attack on money itself, the Buckly v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
On the evidence, that defence was bound to fail.The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Rix, Jacob -- who gave the judgment to which all three judges contributed -- and Patten) dismissed Lucasfilm's appeal but allowed Ainsworth's in part. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
In the US, it was found in the 1990s that a prohibition on automatic telephone direct marketing that applied to political campaigning was constitutional: the case is Van Bergen v Minnesota 59 F.3d 1541 (8th Circuit CA). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:44 pm
As Lord Hoffmann said in 2005, a GAAR may be a cure that is worse than the disease.Treaty Override and Certificate of Residency The GAAR also contains a non-obtstante clause providing that it overrides “anything contained in the Act” (thereby including section 90). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
Readers may recall that this is the case in which Lord Justice Jacob, as he then was, trenchantly stated that " ... if Neurim are wrong, then the Regulation will not have achieved its key objects for large areas of pharmaceutical research: it will not be fit for purpose. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 2:39 am
The importance of property inspections for landlords Although, in a sense, tenants ‘own’ a property during a tenancy, their rights are not unfettered: Tenants are bound by the terms of their tenancy agreement, and They have an obligation to look after the property in a ‘tenant-like manner’ (pursuant to Lord Denning’s judgement in the case of Warren v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:41 pm
State, 2018 Fla. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
As Lord Henry Brougham declared and the Supreme Court of Canada embraced in R v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
But does the finality of an adoption order in technical legal terms override the protection extended by the Convention to what may be called, for want of a better phrase, the undeniable biological state of things? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:01 am
Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which permitted suspicionless stops and searches to be carried out by the police in connection with counter-terrorism policing, was declared illegal by the ECHR in Gillan and Quinton v UK. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
By Connor Moyle A recent appellate decision, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
However, it is the postscript to the judgment of Lord Justice McFarlane (right) to which I wish to refer here. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
In 1982 in a case called R. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection in the house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
