Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 3401 - 3420 of 133,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord… [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 12:00 am by John J. Burke
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on May 9, 2012 sent the case titled GPX International Tire Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
Appeal Board) v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 01854, Decided on March 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn May 1991 Cynthia T. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:09 am by sally
C v D [2011] EWCA Civ 646; [2011] WLR (D) 186 “An offer to settle under CPR Part 36 could not be time limited. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:31 pm by Mark Patrick
On May 12, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the patent eligibility of software in Enfish, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]