Search for: "State v. Risk"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 28,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 8:56 am
The US Supreme Court case School of Board of Nassau County, Florida, v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:56 pm
Miller’s report states that only in highly uncommon circumstances would the OPIS transaction make any kind of profit, but that five percent of the time it could make between $3,450,000 and $6,300,000. [read post]
SYNTHETIC DRUG BUSTS: FEDERAL ARRESTS FOR FAKE POT AND DESIGNER DRUGS THAT ARE LEGAL UNDER STATE LAW
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
Landis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:15 am
The judgment in the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
This question was considered inRB (Algeria) v SSHD [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 7:37 pm
The draft MDUFA V commitment letter states that FDA plans to transition the pilot program to a “sustainable and expanded program” by the end of FY 2023, incorporating lessons learned from the pilot program. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:28 am
See American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:51 pm
In JANA Master Fund v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 2:26 pm
The facts of the Colorado case, Haffner v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained "[Firefighter's] injury was the result of an incidental — not accidental — event," referencing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, because Firefighter's injury was sustained while Firefighter was performing routine duties, not as a result of an unexpected event as the dehydration suffered by Firefighter while running in hot weather in heavy gear was a foreseeable risk of the firefighting training exercise. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
” In Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained "[Firefighter's] injury was the result of an incidental — not accidental — event," referencing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, because Firefighter's injury was sustained while Firefighter was performing routine duties, not as a result of an unexpected event as the dehydration suffered by Firefighter while running in hot weather in heavy gear was a foreseeable risk of the firefighting training exercise. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:21 am
In this post, Yeva Agayan, an associate in the Litigation and Arbitration team at CMS, previews a case BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112 which is being heard by the UK Supreme Court this week and relates to a payment of a dividend. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:01 am
” Amburgy v. [read post]
