Search for: "State v. Rowe" Results 3401 - 3420 of 3,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
This from SCOTUSblog: In one of two rulings Wednesday on death penalty procedures in Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas' highest state court wrongly put up a new legal barrier to a death row inmate's challenge to jury instructions in his sentencing. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:17 am
Via Scotusblog: "In one of two rulings Wednesday on death penalty procedures in Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas' highest state court wrongly put up a new legal barrier to a death row inmate's challenge to jury instructions in his sentencing. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
In the state case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Criminal Appeals wrongly put up a new legal barrier to a death row inmate's challenge to jury instructions in his sentencing. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 7:09 am
  Here is an early report from Lyle Denniston:In one of two rulings Wednesday on death penalty procedures in Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas' highest state court wrongly put up a new legal barrier to a death row inmate's challenge to jury instructions in his sentencing. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:14 pm
  It is note 2 and reads, "See Transcript of Record at 6068-69, State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:26 am
Filiaggi is on death row for chasing his ex-wife, Lisa Huff Filiaggi, from her West 29th Street house in Lorain to a neighbor's home and shooting her at point blank in January 1994. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:22 am
  It is note 2 and reads, "See Transcript of Record at 6068-69, State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
For the past 12 years, Panetti has been known as the "preacher" to other inmates on the state's death row. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
According to the state's brief, the Supreme Court had spelled out in a 1998 decision, Stewart v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:08 pm
If the court holds that a defendant need only be aware that he or she is about to be executed and why the state says it wants the execution, even a profoundly mentally ill death row inmate might not be spared the ultimate punishment. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
More federalism in administering Atkins When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
" Keyes concluded that Clark should be excluded from execution under both the Texas Mentally Retarded Persons Act and the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Atkins v. [read post]