Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 5,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 1:27 pm
Today’s opinion in Howell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:59 am
Murphy and McGirt v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Texas, 19-411; Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed an opinion respecting the denial of cert. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:59 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in the Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm
Of course, experts in this area — including some Obama-supporting liberals — told us that Citizens United wasn’t that big a deal.)Thanks to last year’s juicy Obama v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
At today’s oral argument in Packingham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor is up next with the announcement in Dubin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:43 am
My preview of City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
” (That case, Gill v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The Sotomayor-Kagan-Jackson concurrence stated that "All the Reconstruction Amendments (including the due process and equal protection guarantees and prohibition of slavery) 'are self-executing,' meaning that they do not depend on legislation. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:21 pm
The case, Louisiana v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
A few weeks later, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Comer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm
A few weeks later, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Comer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
Patchak v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
” Ginsburg’s dialogue also included a line about “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet,” a callback to her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am
” Justice Scalia gave as an example the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
