Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 3401 - 3420
of 7,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By its December 2, 2015 decision in Quinn v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am
Calland, and Stephen R. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 12:06 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer asked Katyal how this would be different than a citizen of one state facing the potentially biased juries of another state for conduct in the forum state. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
Holder – no state or local government is currently required to obtain preclearance at all. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm
Texas is the fifth-largest among the states as an egg producer, according to industry statistics. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:20 pm
She testified that she continues to maintain her New York State driver's license. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
As the hearing went on, Justice Stephen G. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Stephen A. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
About the only thing that seems clear after the argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Parra, 'Black's Bank' and the Settlement of Investment Disputes Stephen M. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 1:34 pm
The challengers to the balloting limitation are relying mainly upon a seven-to-two decision by the Court in the 2000 case of Rice v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:12 am
But the argument in Menominee Indian Tribe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:08 am
Filburn and Lochner v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:03 am
Shultz Former Secretary of State General Michael V. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices spar with counsel over excluding securities litigation from state courts
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Twombly and Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm
The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:17 pm
After an hour of oral arguments today in Green v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm
The answer correctly summarized the state of the law of mixed-motive defenses following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. [read post]
