Search for: "State v. Stevens" Results 3401 - 3420 of 7,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
In a podcast for Dropout Nation, California state senator Gloria Romano discusses “her amicus brief in theFriedrichs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the Horn defendants), and Audrey Sager, Esq., Steven Gellerman, Esq., and Sager & Gellerman, Esq. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:50 pm
"Our experience during the past three decades has demonstrated that delays in state-sponsored killings are inescapable and that executing defendants after such is unacceptably cruel," said Justice John Paul Stevens, who disagreed with the court's decision to allow the execution to proceed. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:16 am by Juliette Rousselot
This case serves as a sad reminder of the state of LGBT rights in much of Africa. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (right, credit), summarizing and quoting the conclusions drawn by New York University Professor David Garland in his just-published book, Peculiar Institution: America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition.In the same review, Stevens restated his own conclusion, which he had announced in his opinion in Baze v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 2:50 pm
The following came to me from The Indiana Lawyer:In Steven Peters v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Nearly three decades later, Justices Scalia and O'Connor picked up the judicial takings theme in a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
The Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in Herring v. [read post]