Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 16,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
The case Lieu v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm
In the aftermath of the Schrems II ruling, Věra Jourova, the Vice President of the European Commission for Value and Transparency has stated in an official press conference that the European Commission will work with their American counterparts to discuss a way forward. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
United States strengthens the case against Trump's sweeping use of Section 212(f)—here and here: Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
In Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSOP) v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Alone, we are weak, but together, we are strong. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:15 am
In Wortham v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
For years, there was an obvious deal to be done in Congress and in red states: pass a strong gay-rights law with strong but bounded religious exemptions. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
" Tthe court pointed out that in New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, the Court of Appeals stated that "courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
" Tthe court pointed out that in New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, the Court of Appeals stated that "courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Vasquez, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
Brandt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
To my way of thinking, in stating their claims they run this point right into the ground (I’m presenting only part of this list):“(1) We treat the Constitution as a legal text, originally enacted in the late eighteenth century. (2) This constitutional text regulates the selection of legal officials, even when such regulations are unpopular or contrary to tradition. (3) Actors in our legal system don’t acknowledge, and indeed reject, any official legal breaks or… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
Somin’s bracing prescription, by contrast, is ultimately unduly strong medicine. [read post]
