Search for: "The Author Named Below"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 7,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2011, 7:57 pm
And Justice Kagan is recused.So it only takes four votes for e-Verify to survive, because the court below upheld the state law. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Surely that is not part of the authorization to proceed anonymously. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:38 am
For legal advice, please contact members of the Bigg & Mediocre Rapid Response Team, whose names and contact information we list below. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
(More on Itar-Tass below.) [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:13 pm
Please leave one below or join the discussion on our Facebook page. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
A summary of the "Key Findings" from the Executive Summary follows below. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
§ 1125, enacted in 1946 and addressed in more detail below, prohibits commercial use of trademarks and tradenames likely to cause confusion as to the source of a product or service. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:01 am
It has also been characterized through a “consensus” approach—namely, as “a consensus of minds relative to conduct performed, or to be performed. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:12 am
In this article the author suggests You may have an additional member in your family after you wrote the original will. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:49 am
The American Bar Association has developed model rules of professional conduct which are outlined below, and from which individual state bar associations may develop specific rules of conduct for lawyers. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Below the jump are some excerpts from the respective opinions. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:28 am
Barring exceptions to copyright infringement (more about that below) and a license from the content owner granting permission to exercise these rights (more on this below, too), any exercise of these rights would likely be copyright infringement. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am
(signature of grantor or grantors) The names of the parties shall be typed or printed below the signatures. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
We provide further detail on each case below. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
With one possible exception that I shall explore below, the courts were right to reject the legal claims put forward by Davis. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The envelope please: the award for American law’s worst moment of 2022 goes to the United States Supreme Court for its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization.Because law’s infamous rulings generally do not fly below the radar, it is hardly a surprise to name Dobbs, which has already been subject to withering criticism. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 6:10 am
Code.The text of the version of the statue as in effect as of July 2017 is pasted below: EDUCATION CODETITLE 3. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Unusually for statutes (as opposed to judicially crafted doctrines, such as the Miranda rule), the Logan Act is named after the supposed bad guy: Dr. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm
Author: Luke Hasskamp This article—the third in a series—focuses on the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
I discuss that issue in the third section below. [read post]
