Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 11,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The first principle would be federal deference to state courts and state contract law. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:04 pm
If you want to see our analysis of the pros and cons of workplace arbitration from the employer’s perspective, check out my recent guest post for Continuing Education of the Bar ● California (a program of the University of California and the State Bar of California) on their CEBBlog. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
LEXIS 13507 (TX App., Dec. 21, 2016), a Texas state appeals court held that a provision in the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act that bars a person filing suit if the burden on religious exercise has been cured does not allow the state to avoid liability by curing a burden once the suit has been filed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm
(Allotted Lands; Trespass) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html In re Jerry R. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois discusses the amicus brief that PLF filed in support of a cert. petition filed by a California oyster farm. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Shimoto , April 6, 2015, California Supreme Court [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Indeed, in this case, with Shell having no arranger liability, B&B's insolvency, and the Railroads having only 9% liability, EPA and the State of California are left to pay 91% of the cleanup costs unless they can find additional PRPs. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
But the Exemption Express website is a useful resource to help humans and lawyers alike go through the convoluted decision tree leading to the decision to assert the exemptions of the State of Arizona, or the exemptions of the State of California, or the Federal Exemptions that you usually can't use as your exemptions in an Arizona bankruptcy! [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:49 pm
Schroeder of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
Since most online content constitutes speech, does the First Amendment completely bar the state from regulating in this space? [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm
The Court also stated that a lack of prior accidents, even if properly proven, would not be enough by itself to bar Plaintiff's claim at the summary judgment stage, although it would be relevant supporting evidence. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 3:33 pm
California's plan to target gun rights reinforces that point. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm
Grimm, of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Maryland, who oversees class action litigation arising out of last year’s data breach of Marriott’s Starwood guest reservation database. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of proceeding is… [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:43 am
Judicial Oversight California, like all other states, has an agency whose job it is to investigate allegations of judicial misconduct. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:09 pm
The California State Bar will discipline lawyers who fail or refuse to comply. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
California (1927). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:13 pm
In this July 2018 post, I assessed the initial district court decision in the Trump administration's lawsuit against California's "sanctuary state" policies. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:04 pm
Ditto the California Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:45 am
We’ve objected to the California Bar’s required use of ExamSoft in the bar exam and won a partial victory when–shortly after receiving our letter–the Clerk and Executive Officer of the California Supreme Court asked the state bar to propose a timetable within 60 days for the deletion of all the 2020 bar applicants’ personally identifiable information collected via ExamSoft. [read post]
