Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
On Aug. 31, the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
Diplomatic immunity bars these workers from claiming their legal rights in court and, as a result, gives diplomats a free pass to mistreat them deliberately and without penalty. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
There is also a private right of action for shareholders to pursue claims for violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 in federal court. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Kagan’s 2001 article “Presidential Administration,” published in the Harvard Law Review, was named the year’s top scholarly article by the American Bar Association’s Section on Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA, meanwhile, does not preempt CEQA when it is used to make decisions concerning issues outside federal jurisdiction or those that are compatible with the federal government’s exclusive licensing authority. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:04 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 1:17 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm
Responsible for conceptualizing and implementing litigation strategies and tactics in complex court cases, including cases involving multiple plaintiffs and defendants; class actions; cases involving a wide range of legal claims, potentially to include a mix of federal-law and state- law claims; and cases arising in federal courts as well as in state courts around the country. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
There have also been AI-related legislative developments in the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Black & Decker, (U.S.), Inc., 151 F.3d 765, 883-74 (8th Cir. 1998) (applying Missouri law); Anderson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Black & Decker, (U.S.), Inc., 151 F.3d 765, 883-74 (8th Cir. 1998) (applying Missouri law); Anderson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Black & Decker, (U.S.), Inc., 151 F.3d 765, 883-74 (8th Cir. 1998) (applying Missouri law); Anderson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Fortunately, the Reese court said, "no way, no how," and joined the vast majority of courts refuse to allow common-law claims for failure to recall a product in the absence of any governmental edict.For one thing, failure-to-recall claims are barred by the state of the art defense:[N]o common law duty exists. . .requiring a manufacturer to recall a product after the product has left the manufacturer's control. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 12:49 pm
Update 8/7/2020: We received notice from the Dallas Bar Association of another scam targeting Texas attorneys. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Well before trial began, Justice Engoron put the Trump Organization under the watch of a court-appointed monitor: former federal judge Barbara Jones. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Does that person have to endure arrest or worse to bring a federal court challenge? [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 157 (1973) (“I am unable to perceive why we should not insist on the same level of scientific understanding on the patent bench that clients demand of the patent bar, or why lack of such understanding by the judge should be deemed a precious asset”); David L. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Federal Election Commission (2010). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Both involve speedy trial claims. [read post]
