Search for: "U.S. v. Mark*" Results 3401 - 3420 of 24,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
Hence, the government has the burden of demonstrating that a regulation of speech is constitutionally permissible (see U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by Phil
" According to the statute, "any person" may bring suit to recover the penalty for false marking, with the U.S. government receiving half the amount recovered in such a qui tam proceeding. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:25 am
., barnesandnoble.com llc, and Nook Media LLC (collectively, "B&N"), which alleged that B&N's e-reader Nook infringed U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
Ashcroft, 536 U.S. 186 (2003), that the Copyright Clause of the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Free Speech Coal., 535 U.S. 234, 245 (2002) (citing Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:47 pm by ernst
Supreme Court's recent Eighth Amendment decision in Bucklew v. [read post]