Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit" Results 3401 - 3420 of 6,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by Ben Vernia
On June 6, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in US ex rel Foglia v Renal Ventures Mgmt, sided with the First, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits (and against the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits), and held that the whistleblower in the declined qui tam before it need only allege the particular details of a scheme to submit false claims, along with reliable indicia that lead to a strong inference that claims were actually submitted. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (fiduciary duty)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:55 am by Joy Waltemath
According to an amicus brief filed by the Solicitor General of the United States in support of the employer’s petition for certiorari to review the Ninth Circuit’s reversal of a district court decision finding such activities were not compensable, the trial court was right and the Ninth Circuit got it wrong. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:41 am by Scott Hervey
 Petrella appealed to the Ninth Circuit which affirmed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am by John Elwood
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Greg Mersol
  At  the time the suit was filed, the Ninth Circuit authority was unfavorable to their enforcement, but by the approval hearing the United States Supreme Court had rendered its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm by Nikki Siesel
Lucky 13 further claims that Swift had filed about sixty federal trademark applications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is in conflict with itself over gay rights issues, Idaho’s governor on Friday asked that court to put the state’s same-sex marriage appeal on a faster track. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-983. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten, as required by the Ninth Circuit and the supreme courts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont; or whether it is enough to show that a “reasonable person” would regard the statement as threatening, as held by other federal courts of appeals and state courts of last resort. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  In 2010, the Ninth Circuit vacated Detrich’s death penalty but the Court remanded in light of Cullen v. [read post]