Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 5,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
The long-awaited decision by the United States Supreme Court on business method patents was issued on June 19, 2014. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:10 am
From United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2012, in Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 372 U.S. 734, 737 (1963). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:39 pm
Belgium match is underway - a win is needed by the United States to advance to the quarterfinals of the 2014 World Cup. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated decision in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) greenhouse gas case. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:59 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has been instrumental in defining legal rights and obligations pertaining to Indian lands since its first path-making decision in the field in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:53 pm
In 2010, however, the United States Supreme Court ruled in New Process Steel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
” For several minutes, it looked like die deutsche ’Schaft was going to give the United States the shaft. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:53 pm
In 2010, however, the United States Supreme Court ruled in New Process Steel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
