Search for: "Wells v. Place" Results 3401 - 3420 of 31,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The burden is placed on the State to prove that the search "'falls within one of the few well delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement.'" Ibid. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The remaining two arguments made on behalf of AIB were dismissed by reference to previous case law (principally Target Holdings, with reliance also placed on the Canadian case of Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton and Co [6]). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
 art. 14.03(a)(1) (West Supp. 2015) (warrantless arrest permitted when person is found in a suspicious place under circumstances that reasonably show he is guilty of a felony); Swain v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
It's a definite piece of advocacy -- indeed, a well-written and well-structured one -- and while it comes in many places perilously close to affirmatively misstating the law by entirely ignoring key distinctions, I think the thing is more properly viewed as being within the permissible (and very broad) bounds of proper advocacy. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Innovator v Innovator - does this matter where injunctions are concerned? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Ilya Somin
” The treatment of the land under state and local law includes restrictions on land use in place at the time the owner acquired the lots, but possibly other regulations, as well. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
Patient: Well, I want a second opinion. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]