Search for: "Williams v. A"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 19,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:09 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
William Jimenez, No. 21-2954 (2d Cir. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:01 pm
Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Care Improvement Act)Williams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:12 pm
Williams (2008)). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:13 am
Attorneys General William P. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:08 am
William D. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:54 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 7:30 am
The Court of Appeals rules in favor of the inmate.The case is Williams v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:54 am
Pineda v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
In Williams v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:15 am
Facts: This case (Williams v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
In Galvan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
William J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
WILLIAM RODENBOUGH III, App. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
Williams, Seventh Circuit: Appellant pled guilty to identity theft-related crimes and was sentenced to 56 months' imprisonment. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:05 am
By William W. [read post]