Search for: "Young v. Ins*" Results 3401 - 3420 of 7,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2021, 6:50 am by Mark Astarita
Ernst & Young, set forth the “family resemblance” test to determine whether a note is a security. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
" Here's the story:"Once upon a time there was a young boy named Peter who was sent to bed without any dinner. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:15 am
The two men became friendly with young Jeffrey, and took him on car rides, out for dinners. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:17 am by Ben
The case has yet to get to court by Dylan gives us a thorough review of the position of jokes under copyright in US law - in particular the decision Foxworthy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
This article analyses how a young man who might have been marginalized in society because of the circumstances of his birth, ethnic origin, and religious identity rose to prominence in law, politics, and business in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Obviously, no one can (or should) go to all of these—young scholars often face significant budget constraints in addition to needing to reserve lots of time to write. [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:55 pm by Larry
In reality, the language is taken from In Zone Brands v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Jamie Markham
” The trial court also erred by comparing the young defendant to the broader class of all persons who may be incarcerated for first-degree murder, including adults. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
Instances of "simulated" child sexual conduct - computer generated or made by young-looking adults - are not judged under the super-special First Amendment exception for child pornography, but rather under the merely special First Amendment exception for obscenity. [read post]