Search for: "A J Smith" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Kooper v Kooper ; 2010 NY Slip Op 04147  Appellate Division, Second Department ;Angiolillo, J., J. the Court lays out an arc of procedure for non-party discovery. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
The House of Lords approved Powell in J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
As you may have noticed from the neutral citation, this is a Scottish decision, delivered by Lady Smith in the Outer House of the Court of Session last week and accessible in full here. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Smith, 497 U.S. 227 (1990), the question was whether the rule of Caldwell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:32 am by Bill Marler
Cahill, CEO, Kraft Foods #15 David MacLennan, President and CEO, Cargill #14 John Mackey, Founder and Co-CEO, Whole Foods Market #13 Barack and Michelle Obama, President and First Lady #12 Rachael Ray, Television personality #11 William J. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Bhabha, Erica Turret, and Peggy Xu, Jenner & Block LLP, on Tuesday, August 6, 2024 Tags: dei, EEOC, SFFA, Supreme Court Corporate Governance in an Era of Geoeconomics Posted by Curtis J. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Bhabha, Erica Turret, and Peggy Xu, Jenner & Block LLP, on Tuesday, August 6, 2024 Tags: dei, EEOC, SFFA, Supreme Court Corporate Governance in an Era of Geoeconomics Posted by Curtis J. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
Judges shouldn't muse His Honour said:In the case of Smith & Fields[9] to which I was referred by Ms Tonkin who appeared for the wife, Murphy J under the heading of “The Nature of the Matrimonial Relationship” observed that in that case there was a “practical union of both lives and property” (quoting Deane J in Mallet). [read post]