Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 4:58 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The first day of March brings a whole group of authors discussing the implications of today's Stab v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:19 am by Daniel Richardson
  Marriage, notes the SCOV, citing to its landmark decision in Baker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
This is not a difficult problem of interpretation, the company says, contrasting a classic example of how the word “dozen” may in fact mean 12 or 13 (a baker’s dozen), justifying hearing evidence about what parties intended. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Specifically, the analysis addresses how these limitations on the rule of stare decisis might affect the precedential value of Baker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The Baker Hostetler website has a new Executive Alert discussing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Kartman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Orin Kerr
It lasts 40 minutes, and it features Walter Dellinger, John Eastman, John Baker, and Dean Reuter.In thinking over my reaction from yesterday, some of the feedback I’ve received has me somewhat less concerned than I was yesterday about the Obama Administration’s approach. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Specifically, the analysis addresses how these limitations on the rule of stare decisis might affect the precedential value of Baker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:48 am by Steve Lash
Saying Baltimore had the right idea, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:01 pm by Stefanie Levine
Next up is Peter Brown of Baker Hostetler discussing critical pitfalls in Intellectual Property Licenses. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by Record on Appeal
Yesterday, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion (unanimous, authored by CJ Recktenwald) in CompUSA Stores, LP v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:44 pm by Isabel McArdle
Similar points were made in the decision of Rose LJ and Scott Baker J in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Ex p World Development Movement [1995] 1 WLR 386, in which the World Development Movement was permitted to challenge a decision not to give assurance that the UK would provide no further funds for a hydro-electric power station outside the jurisdiction. [read post]