Search for: "C/T"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 50,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
A certain amount of power you have about your personal info: other people want it b/c they don’t have it, and you can use that as a weapon. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am
Marketa Trimble: is Kokopelli diffuse or targeted b/c multiple tribes see meaning in it? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:26 am
Was Côté in fact an autonomous public agent? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am
Midgley: We get notices styled as (c) but they’re really (a)—this is content that flowed through our network but we have no way of verifying whether it was actually there since we don’t store the content, as per 512(a)’s requirements. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
In 1995, it successfully argued that it shouldn’t be barred from using ads such as “I love C&H the best” or “C&H tastes best,” which harmed it because its competition was free to make similar unsubstantiated claims. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:53 am
The IRS doesn’t take action against individual B the whistleblower named – but does take action against tax lawyer C’s other clients who engaged in the tax shelter – that is a related party action and the whistleblower should get credit for any collected proceeds. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm
In many situations, this isn’t a hard issue to resolve. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:57 am
C 20-00170 WHA, 2020 WL 6591366 (N.D. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Carrier c. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
But that’s like saying buying options is irrational b/c most options don’t pan out. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
20 ILCS 2520/4(c). [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Wouldn’t it be easier to simply say that perhaps Yoshida’s trade marks were not that distinctive? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
As a result, the previous agreement of the appellant with that earlier text was conclusively withdrawn.The fact that the ED did not agree to the last amendment of claim 1 of the main request as filed with the appellant’s letter of 23 November 2011 but held it to be inadmissible for various procedural and substantive reasons (as set out both in its communication of 25/30 November 2011 and in the addendum to the decision under appeal) could not and did not “revive” or… [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
So there they made the PSC rate the same as the general C corporation rate.In conference, the House "receded" (and I suspect it didn't fight very hard). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:36 pm
[T]he fact that Jungkeit’s composition is not “ineffective” does not mean that it reads on the “essentially free of antioxidants” limitation. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am
C'est la vie. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
See 17 USC 504(c) which reads in part: (c) Statutory Damages. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:08 pm
For example, suppose partnership P plans to reorganize to become corporation C and distribute a different number of voting securities in C to partners of P in exchange for their partnership interests. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
C’est ainsi que La pub et le droit a vu le jour, le 1er août 2004. [read post]
