Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
It can not speculate and conjecture as to what caused a defendant to lose control of his car. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:42 am
On Monday, Attorney General Eric Holder boasted that that the national operation, which targets an array of investment fraud schemes, has involved 231 criminal cases that have led to prison sentences for 87 defendants. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
Defendants cannot assume that that their judgment creditors will merely accept the maximum insurance payout. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:55 am
Doe was driving the vehicle? [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:05 pm
Does my prosecution experience help my current clients? [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:15 pm
Valentine, 232 F.3d 350, 359 (3d Cir. 2000) (recognizing that momentary compliance with an officer's orders does not constitute a seizure). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
According to Professor Mike Koehler of the FCPA Professor Blog, Judge Leon stated: [V]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the Court does not believe the Government has produced sufficient evidence to enable a rational trier of fact to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that each of these six defendants participated in the overarching conspiracy charged in the superseding indictment in this case. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:10 pm
It doesn’t happen that often—but it does happen. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:06 pm
Yet, I see it almost every day, usually with very bad results for the defendant. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm
After being attacked for allegedly defending the driver who killed one of its insureds, what does Progressive Insurance have to say for itself? [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 5:02 pm
” (I think this is a fascinating question: It does seem quite likely that the default assumption today is that all drugs are FDA-approved. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:31 pm
” But these exclusions typically have this exemption: “this exclusion does not apply to infringement, in your advertisement, of copyright, trade dress or slogan. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 5:40 am
The post Illinois Supreme Court rules state workers’ comp law does not preempt employee claims under privacy law appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently held that a class action defendant cannot “pick off” the named plaintiff and thereby render the case moot by simply offering full relief by way of settlement offer or offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Mar. 1, 2011), a products liability case that had been settled a year earlier, the plaintiff sought to re-open the case and requested sanctions alleging the defendant systematically destroyed evidence, failed to produce relevant documents and committed other discovery violations in bad faith. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
Update #2 (4/2/2011): Defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted on March 30. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:00 pm
Maryland prosecutors need not tell defendants about the past dishonesty of the state’s witnesses before a guilty plea is entered, Maryland’s second-highest court has ruled in upholding the drug possession conviction of a man whose main accuser had a record of lying and would later be convicted of police corruption. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
Barney, the majority of the Supreme Court of Virginia upheld the conviction of the defendant for use of a firearm in a bank robbery, when the Commonwealth's evidence showed only that she threatened to kill the bank teller and kept her hand in her pocket. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:13 pm
Virginia [docket] on Friday that a defendant indicted on multiple charges who agrees to have each charge tried separately gives up his right to benefit from an acquittal in the first trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently held that a class action defendant cannot “pick off” the named plaintiff and thereby render the case moot by simply offering full relief by way of settlement offer or offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. [read post]
