Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 3421 - 3440 of 29,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 5:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Pataki, 196 F.3d 56, 65-66 (2d Cir. 1999) This means that even if the governing case law was clearly established (and in hindsight it looks like the defendant broke the law), that defendant can still avoid liability if his actions were objectively reasonable. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:36 am by Ben Vernia
He likewise denied a motion to strike allegations that some of the defendants spoliated evidence (by burning documents and destroying a hard drive), reasoning that at the current stage of the case, the allegations failed to satisfy the standards of Rule 12(f) for striking “redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:08 am by Elie Mystal
Tags: Camille Andrews, Employment Data, Employment Statistics, Inflated Statistics, Job Searches, Job Statistics, Law School Deans, Law School Transparency, Law Schools, Money, Paul Campos, Paul F. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
Metro-North Commuter Railroad (2d Cir. 1999) and In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation, 280 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2001). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm by Bexis
., ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 3354, et al., slip op. (8th Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm
The second lawsuit makes similar allegations of copyright infringement of TIRS against Defendant Bart Peterson's The Mind Trust. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
Jeremiah, 493 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2007) (monitoring finances permissible for defendant who failed to pay restitution). [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
And if you defend FDA-regulated manufacturers, you should hate it too - unless you enjoy hearing your client called a criminal, or worse. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The opposing papers also failed to demonstrate that the instant motion by the plaintiff is premature due to the obligor defendants' inability to state facts essential to opposition as contemplated by CPLR 3212[f]. [read post]