Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 7,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
The IPKat's good friend Ventsi Stoilov has produced an entire English translation (here). [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
Alex Sink v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
Ever since the Court issued its decision in D.C. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
To illustrate the common law approach, Koopman points to Bukton v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
She stated, at paras. [read post]
Appeal Court Says Judges Cannot Avoid Determinations of Grave Risk of Harm in Hague Convention Cases
24 Apr 2018, 12:47 pm
(Zafar v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:46 am
., LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:33 am
The LOU provided for London Arbitration before a three-man Tribunal, stating in part: “we confirm that the Ship Owners agree that the above mentioned claims shall be subject to London Arbitration … and English Law to apply … and for each party to nominate its own arbitrator and the two so appointed may appoint a third”. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:03 am
We have another appellate court case that emphasizes that point quiet well in Stratford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus in the case of Unicolors v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Solicitor General to participate in oral argument as an amicus in the case of Unicolors v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:08 am
By Kelly McClure In Araujo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:52 am
As stated in the Krimstock Order, the Department must provide notice of the right to a retention hearing in two distinct ways: Notice of the right to a hearing will be provided at the time of seizure by attaching to the [Property Clerk’s] voucher already provided to the person from whom a vehicle is seized a notice, in English and Spanish, as set forth below. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
I'll spare you the gory details, here and give you SCOTUSBlog's "plain English" description of the issue: "Does the First Amendment give state employees the right to decline to pay union dues used for political advocacy by the union? [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
