Search for: "German v. German" Results 3421 - 3440 of 5,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
  Mr Justice Floyd presided over proceedings -– and he also presided over Schütz v Werit at first instance. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am by Florian Mueller
But if you don't (or shouldn't) believe in your case, you'll most likely suffer a defeat, or a multi-year stay, and you might then be better off with a lay jury in a non-tech-savvy rural area.Next week the Düsseldorf Regional Court will decide on two more Huawei v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:46 am by Florian Mueller
I still believe that Microsoft is going to win the Google Maps case, and at today's IPCom v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:48 pm by Darius Whelan
For further information, please contact Sinead.eaton@ul.ie10-12 April 2013:Annual Conference of British and Irish Law, Education and Technology Association, Liverpool, Englandhttp://www.bileta.ac.uk/Home/Thu. 11 April 2013:Land and Conveyancing Law: The New Law in Practice - Seminar 3 on  Selected Conveyancing and Land Law Issues, Faculty of Law, University College Corkhttp://www.ucc.ie/en/lawsite/eventsandnews/Upcoming/Land/Fri. 12 April 2013:Recovery and Confiscation of Criminal Assets in the… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:55 am by Florian Mueller
Simply put, the backers of VP8 are largely the losers of the patent game, while companies with strong patent positions prefer H.264.A first Nokia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
The General Court of the European Union is today concerned with Knut-related dispute Case T=250/10 KNUT IP Management v OHIM — Zoologischer Garten Berlin (KNUT — DER EISBÄR; in English: KNUT – the polar bear). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
This decision, at paras 37 to 47, also brings UK law more closely in line with equivalent Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court) case law including Schütz v Mauser (Pallet Container II) Case X ZR 97/11, in July 2012 [by pure coincidence, a full English translation of this ruling was published in the January 2013 issue of JIPLP]. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 8:51 am by Florian Mueller
Matthias Sonntag of Gleiss Lutz even called the court three weeks ago to suggest that today's two Nokia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Today, the General Court delivered its judgment in Case T-498/10, David Mayer Naman v OHIM, providing an interesting overview on the mechanics of proof of use and exploring the evaluation of phonetic and conceptual differences of word signs containing personal names and surnames. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 12:19 pm by Florian Mueller
But an email posted by a Google employee to an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) raises questions about FRAND licensing terms, and companies that don't contribute patents to the MPEG LA-Google deal may still hold patents infringed by VP8: Nokia told a German court today at a Nokia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:56 am by Florian Mueller
This morning -- the day after Justice Floyd in the UK declared three of Samsung's standard-essential patents (SEPs) invalid -- Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) ordered a retrial, scheduled for July 26, 2013, in a Samsung v. [read post]