Search for: "High v State" Results 3421 - 3440 of 35,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 1:37 pm by Brent Wieand
The case that laid the foundation for PFAS litigation was Leach v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Makin, the court held that a state cannot discriminate against religious schools in funding tuition in in rural areas with no public high school. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am by Florian Mueller
Its temporary (but indefinite) withdrawal from the German market enables the high-volume smartphone maker (and its OnePlus affiliate) to stand its ground in court:Motions to stay the enforcement of those four injunctions are pending, and while I can't predict what the appeals courts in Munich and Karlsruhe (the latter for the Mannheim rulings) will do, there are serious issues that may very well prove outcome-determinative.OPPO is now aggressively seeking its own German patent… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
With Steyn J stating that the appeal has a “real prospect of success”, it appears that Cadwalladr is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am by Alden Abbott
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
  That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]