Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3421 - 3440 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm by Stephen Page
The husband has historically out-earned the wife by an amount of up to 3:1. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:29 pm by Gregory Forman
As a cynic I note that the seven previous times our appellate courts rejected the continued cohabitation finding it was a husband trying to terminate an ex-wifes alimony, while here it was a wife trying to terminate her ex-husbands alimony. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 10:37 am
Unfortunately, it was incumbent upon the trial court to comply with that panel's order to divide Husband's pension equity between Husband and Wife. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Danielle Citron
 According to the wife, the experience curtailed the couple’s sex life. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:06 am by Gregory Forman
§ 20-1-80 (Supp. 2012) (“All marriages contracted while either of the parties has a former wife or husband living shall be void. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Doing so, he vacated an arbitrator’s $4,000 award to an ex-wife for counsel fees she incurred in connection with her submission to the Supreme Court of a proposed Qualified Domestic Relations Order to implement a division of the ex-husbands pension and her defense of the ex-husbands motion to dismiss that proposed QDRO. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:58 am by Steve Lubet
 Justice Thomas has already made it quite clear that he will sit on politically charged cases notwithstanding his wife's activism, the ACA case (NFIB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:09 am
The New Jersey divorce judge denied the ex-husband's motion to reduce alimony and the ex-wife's cross-motion for counsel fees. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:09 am by Charles Abut
The New Jersey divorce judge correctly rejected the ex-husband's motion to reduce or terminate alimony, on the basis of the ex-wife's relationship with another man. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Charles Abut
 The nature of the ex-wife's relationship with her lady friend was sufficient to order an evidentiary trial as to whether cohabitation was proven under New Jersey law, to either modify or terminate the ex-husband's alimony payments. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:09 am
The New Jersey divorce judge denied the ex-husband's motion to reduce alimony and the ex-wife's cross-motion for counsel fees. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:38 am by Charles Abut
Because his proofs regarding the ex-wife's income were "woefully inadequate and deficient", the ex-husband's motion to reduce his child support payments was properly denied by the New Jersey divorce judge. [read post]