Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 3421 - 3440
of 10,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:27 pm
Weeks ahead of Christmas, Elliot F. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
On 7 January 2016, the Norges Bank has decided to exclude the Chinese company ZTE Corporation, one of the world’s five largest producers of telecommunications equipment and network solutions, from the investment universe of the GPFG. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
Die Verordnung gilt für Waren und Dienstleistungen. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
Die Verordnung gilt für Waren und Dienstleistungen. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
– Chile Free Trade Agreement in Annex 18-F. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm
., In re May, 574 F.2d 1082, 1094, (CCPA 1978) and In re Schechter, 205 F.2d 185, 191, (CCPA 1953).)Finally, the Applicant used these differences to rebut the Examiner's substitution rationale:The Examiner is arguing that the respective methods of treating chronic pain by blocking the neuron are similar to blocking a receptor that activates a muscle by means of a neuron that provides a neurotransmitter such as acetylcholine. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
., In re May, 574 F.2d 1082, 1094, (CCPA 1978) and In re Schechter, 205 F.2d 185, 191, (CCPA 1953).)Finally, the Applicant used these differences to rebut the Examiner's substitution rationale:The Examiner is arguing that the respective methods of treating chronic pain by blocking the neuron are similar to blocking a receptor that activates a muscle by means of a neuron that provides a neurotransmitter such as acetylcholine. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
(F)inishing a close second was Alexey Bersenev’s blog StemCellAssays. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 12:52 pm
Le Global Dossier permet, entre autres, l’accès à l’historique des dossiers d’examen des demandes de brevet déposées dans chacun des bureaux membres du forum IP5, ce qui facilite l’échange de références et d’art antérieur entre les bureaux membres. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
It is curious to also note that the Appellate Division referred to R. 4:50-1(f) as further possible support for a court’s authority to re-open the executory provisions of a prior Judgment. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Sherry F. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
We’re more like wolves—with their big appetites and their guile—than we are like the naïf-ish deer. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
We’re more like wolves—with their big appetites and their guile—than we are like the naïf-ish deer. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In re: Hulu Privacy Litigation, — F. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Petrotech Res. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:28 pm
You’re going to watch the Big — I mean, the Super Bowl. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:51 pm
In re BankAmerica Corp. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:01 pm
Weber, 319 F.3d 581 (3d Cir.2003). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The Federal Circuit panel affirmed based on In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (CCPA 1981), which found no First Amendment violation since the applicant was free to use the mark without the registration. [read post]
