Search for: "Kat"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 6,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 3:19 am
This Kat and Merpel agree that this gives us legal certainty - whether it is always fair is another question. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
Going through his file of items to blog which have fallen behind in his priority list, this Kat has just rediscovered another decision that troubled him when he first spotted it -- not because it was wrong [for a change, mumbles Merpel], but rather because the process of reaching the correct outcome was so long and tortuous, spanning over decade, in respect of a trade mark which this Kat doubts was worth effort given the unlikelihood that it will be used other than in… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
Unlike those who issue groundless threats, Kats don't pull punches. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:29 am
Nor had this Kat, till a day or two ago. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
files where the use in question is approved by the rightholders and not paid for by the customer (licensed content, for example, in connection with a marketing action);Clearly not a Nokia phone,but at least a Kat coverc. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
This Kat has been following with great interest (and indeed some personal stake) the question of who will be entitled to represent before the Unified Patent Court (see for example previous post here). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:01 pm
(This Kat was not able to find a link to the text of the article, but there is a version of the article that is available for Kat readers on ssrn.com, here.) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
In some cases what Mr Klinger did, ie launching a website and suing the Doyle Estate seeking a declaration from the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that he was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that are no longer protected by copyright.The District Court agreed with Mr Klinger, as former guest Kat Miri reported here. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
An academic Kat*In "Not just an academic question -- but an Abstract one", this Kat kick-started what has turned out to be quite a lively discussion about the function of abstracts for journal articles -- particularly within the context of intellectual property. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:16 am
", asks fellow Kat Neil on the IP Finance weblog -- a question on which he offers some perceptive thoughts. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
This Kat thinks that the court has got this right. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:29 am
This claim was brought by The Federal Trade Commission and is currently pending at the US Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit.This Kat thinks the decision is a good one, being an inveterate reader of the small print on the labels of consumer goods and having been surprised on a number of occasions by what he found (he recalls the labelling on one carton of chopped herring that revealed the principal ingredient to be apple). [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:51 am
This Kat hasn't yet had a chance to read the article which, he expects, will be excellent since IJLIT is a well-reputed peer-reviewed journal, but he has read the Abstract and he is embarrassed to say that, having read it a couple of times, he has struggled to understand it. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
", Giovanni saysThis Kat has not yet read the full text of the decision [and likely nothing would change if he did, being the German he learned at secondary school even worst than Giovanni Trapattoni’s]. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
This Kat's apologies to those who are already fed up with all this football here. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Chloe Grover writes to remind the Kat, and readers of this weblog, that there is less than one week remaining to buy tickets to the ball. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:13 pm
This Kat has had his share of reservations about the Unified Patent Court system which has been foist on the European Union's patent fraternity and which has been met by a wide spectrum of responses, from the ecstatic to the apoplectic. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:56 am
Following the Kat's earlier post, thanks are instantly due to Mathieu Pitté for sending us this link to the following information:New method of citing the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the basis of the ECLI (European Case-Law Identifier)I. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
This Kat has spotted something that surprised him on the Curia website. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
B&S had therefore entered an appearance before a court of the UK within the meaning of Article 24 – the UKIPO – and this gave the IPEC jurisdiction.This Kat finds this reasoning perfectly correct and wonders if B&S wasn't clutching at straws by contesting this issue. [read post]
