Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 3421 - 3440 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 9:12 am by Brennan W. Bolt
" The Chickasaw Nation holds a series of treaties with the United States and is governed by its citizen-elected government in accordance with the Chickasaw Nation Constitution. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether the federal government retains an interest in a right of way granted from public lands to railroads, which then abandoned the easement. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Rick Hills
If the state can limit taxes in the name of private freedom, then why can the state not also limit zoning as well? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As an overlay, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) of 1978 announced the United States policy to “protect and preserve for American Indians their inherent right of freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:40 am by Lawrence Solum
Davis School of Law, author of How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the LandUnited States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am by Amy Howe
Frost (Nov. 5) – Whether the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, a federal law governing the National Park Service’s authority over lands in Alaska, bars the National Park Service from regulating other land – owned by the state, native corporations or private owners – within the boundaries of Alaska national parks. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
That conclusion is supported by United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 10:47 am by Tom W. Bell
Therefore, it is most reasonable to construe the reference to ‘private property’ in the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment as encompassing the property of state and local governments when it is condemned by the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:38 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Fish and Wildlife Service centers on the issue of whether land in Louisiana can be dedicated as a “critical habitat” to protect the endangered dusky gopher frog, which currently doesn’t live in the state. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Carter Ruml
Fleener, the United States would receive title to the defendant Property in fee simple since [Mr.] [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
Ct, April 27, 2007) and American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
It relied on the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 3 exemption for “new, small facilities or structures” including “[o]ne single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone” (14 Cal. [read post]