Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
At paragraph 49 of his judgment, the learned judge cited Lord Bingham’s much repeated observations as to the purposes of an “Article 2 investigation” in the leading case of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.[7] These purposes include bringing the facts to light, exposing discreditable conduct or dangerous practices, and providing some degree of comfort to the deceased’s relative by ensuring that lessons are learnt from… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
A Time Lord. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
We posted recently on the case of Holder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
(See, AAMA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
The 1975 decision of the House of Lords in Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd was revolutionary in that it permitted English courts to award judgment in a foreign currency. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The succinct test stated by Lord Rodger at [7] will be a useful starting point for first instance judges in cases where anonymity applications are made. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
As Lord Hope observes, persecution for reasons of homosexuality was not perceived as a problem by the High Contracting Parties. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
” The full hearing came before Lord Justice Carnwath, Lord Justice Jackson and Mr Justice Hedley. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) - Read Judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s “Anne Frank” policy of sending back gay refugees to their home countries where they feared persecution is unlawful as it breached their human rights.. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
To the objection that there was interest charged on the loan of the broker's fee, Lord Clarke says: Section 9(4) does not prohibit the charging of interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill, which is to receive a Second Reading in the House of Lords this Friday, seeks to address these concerns by revising many elements of the law of libel. [read post]
