Search for: "People v. More" Results 3421 - 3440 of 43,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
This point was made clear in a recent decision by the California Court of Appeal in People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  There’s one problem with that analysis:  delay also gives him more time to screw up. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
I appreciate and sympathize with the anger many people feel about the decision, and I wish the Court’s decision had gone the other way. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The policy choices may be to tell people how they have to present numerators v. denominators. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:41 pm
* Are bankers even more narcissistic than lawyers? [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
  Because people on the Commission are, I'm confident, not merely bureaucrats, but are rather people. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
There is no evidence that it is contrary to parliamentary intentions, which is a more pertinent issue. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:33 am by Stephen Page
The High Court in Masson v Parsons [2019] HCA 212 left open the possibility that more than two parents could be recognised under the Family Law Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:33 am by Stephen Page
The High Court in Masson v Parsons [2019] HCA 212 left open the possibility that more than two parents could be recognised under the Family Law Act. [read post]