Search for: "People v. Profit" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm by Kim Krawiec
In my last post on this topic, I discussed Kamakahi v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:58 am by Andres
In the case of Media CAT Ltd v Adams & Ors [2011] EWPCC 10, Media CAT accused several people of infringing pornographic material. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
The House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet held a hearing on "Promoting Investment and Protecting Commerce Online: Legitimate Sites v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
This attack comes at a time when the world needs every agricultural tool available to meet the needs of a growing population, expected to reach 9 billion people by 2050. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm by Michael Froomkin
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
Law §349 et ff. as per the Terms and Conditions) PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASSES v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:09 pm
The contribution of this member of the blog team, being a little note on one of his favourite cases -- Case C-208/09 Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber), 22 December 2010 -- can be read here. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Feature intensity is an optimal combination of eyeballs, cost, and profit. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:06 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has filed amicus briefs in two medical marijuana cases pending in Michigan appellate courts; one case is from Oakland County, the other from Isabella County.The Oakland County case, the well-known People v Redden debacle, involved whether an unregistered marijuana user could nevertheless assert the defenses set forth in the Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Today, instead of protecting the health and well-being of our people, some are protecting the profits of large polluters, and I simply think that's wrong. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
His investment firm’s “apparent lack of profitability,” as well as other evidence, the board wrote, “suggested that it may be seriously troubled and a source of potential future costs or liabilities. [read post]