Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 11:00 am
"GT is alleged to have used monies charged to the Superior Court of Guam for lobbying activities "unrelated to judicial purposes. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
(See People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Supreme Court, March 03, 2008 Boulware v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
S 1277-A Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA3581A
Sweeney (MS) -- Relates to the establishment of sex offender treatment programs and establishes mandatory treatment and supervision requirements for sex offenders Same as S 6674 Last Act: 03/04/08 reported referred to codesA4988
Eddington -- Requires the promulgation of rules and regulations which shall include guidelines and procedures on the placement of certain sex offenders No Same as Last Act: 03/04/08 reported… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:35 pm
" The above-entitled case is "People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
(Superior Court of San Diego County, No. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Kwaak v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Supreme Court embraced in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:24 pm
The 9th Circuit, in Bradley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:32 pm
* People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 2:09 pm
You might live to regret it, even if it takes 20 years for it to catch up with you, as happened to the defendant in People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
MacIsaac of the Ontario Superior Court, during the final seven months of this employment, however, Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
, Inc., Superior Court of Paris, May 22, 2000. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:48 am
If the Agency doesn't provide strong regulatory oversight, then inevitably unsafe medical devices will enter the market and people - real flesh and blood people - are going to get hurt. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
" Shaw v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:49 pm
OAKLAND, California -- The trial of People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
Superior Court (United Conservation Water Dist.), case no. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
The doctrine on this is a bit complicated, but I think it is fair to say that the four leading Supreme Court cases --- Raley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
But I think that the trial court got this one right. [read post]
