Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 4,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
About 70 years later, SCOTUS moved away from this theistic definition in Torcaso v Watkins where it held that the Establishment Clause prohibits government from ‘aid[ing] those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs’. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
In Zurcher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
The Nintendo v PC Box case provided guidance in relation to what constitutes TPMs and whether they apply to video games (in particular, where a combination of software- and hardware-based measures have been implemented) . [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
A Long Island Criminal Lawyer said this focus was made manifest by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Balcerak v County of Nassau, which concerned an injury to a Nassau County correction officer. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:25 am
Véase libra de Jersey. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:30 pm
[52] The leading authority on this section is the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in George v. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 10:35 am
Ferko v Ealing Magistrates Court & Ors (2024) EWHC 2592 (Admin) This was an appeal by case stated to the High Court from a decision of Ealing Magistrates Court on a statutory nuisance/section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
David Robert Barkshire and Others v The Queen Ratcliff-on-Soar environmental protest convictions quashed by Court of Appeal: “something went seriously wrong with the trial”. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The Queen’s Speech immediately before the election indicated that draft legislation would be subject to the pre-legislative scrutiny process. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
Judgment in Khader v Aziz, was given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
“Jurisfiction,” unfortunately, is also something we see in our line of work, sometimes making us wonder whether the likes of Emperor Zhark, the Red Queen, and Pinky Perkins may have aliases who serve in the all-too-real judicial branches here in the States. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am
The recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decision in K.M.R. v I.W.R., 2020 ABQB 77 highlights developments in the law further expanding entitlement under the nebulous idea of “other cause” which continue to undermine the formerly robust presumption that children over the age of majority have no right to child support (see, for example, Geran v Geran, 2011 SKCA 55 or Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
In Daboll v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
Although Man Choi Chiu contends that the LLC’s records were incorrect, he cannot subsequently take a position contrary to that taken in the income tax returns which he admitted that he signed (see Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman, 12 NY3d 415, 422; Livathinos v Vaughan, 121 AD3d 485; Winship v Winship, 115 AD3d 1328; Czernicki v Lawniczak, 74 AD3d 1121, 1125; Peterson v Neville, 58 AD3d 489). [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:44 am
Queen, 132 F.3d 991 (U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:31 am
Faced with mixed jurisprudence from other jurisdictions, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal answers this question for that province in Crook v Druxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 (CanLII), rendering a decision that is harmonious with the state of the law in Alberta and British Columbia. [read post]
