Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 3421 - 3440 of 7,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Steve Vladeck
But rather than stop there (as the Court's 2009 decision in Pearson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 2:02 pm
"Argument preview: FERC v. the states -- Round 2. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That decision has now set the stage for the next round. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Twitter suspends 125,000 accounts for promoting terrorism, most related to ISIS https://t.co/m5wgw48ZIs -> Courthouse News Service https://t.co/nnTKwyFM2B -> Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 02/05/16 https://t.co/qrH06Ow55w -> Case Law, Strasbourg: Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete and Index.hu Zrt v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
(Previous posts here and here) Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas, High Court (CH Div) (15 January 2016) (copy of Judgment). [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
 With the parties clashing since 2012 and the first round subject to at least three appeals (including a potential Supreme Court outing), the evidence points to another appellate visit. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks back at last month’s argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday this blog continued its online symposium on United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
   And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
  On the first go-round, the court actually issued an injunction under state law against a manufacturer’s continuation of FDA-approved advertising. [read post]