Search for: "Rosenberg" Results 3421 - 3440 of 3,543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2007, 5:24 pm
Last year, Rosenberg helped defend Michael Resnick, the former CFO of U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 11:46 am
By focusing on the ways that tort law can frame various issues for public consumption, with a specific examination of the clergy sex scandals, this article by Tim, is a response to those scholars (like Gerry Rosenberg) who have advanced skeptical views of the ways in which (tort law) courts can advance various policy objectives. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 4:22 am
. 'You need somebody who can balance the intelligence imperatives with the law- enforcement imperatives,' says Chuck Rosenberg, a U.S. attorney in Virginia. 'Sometimes they are in conflict, and you need someone to sort that out.' " U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:18 pm
Three types of faculty misconduct appear to have occurred last spring.The first and most blatant (but also rarest) was outright grade retaliation—the sort of issue that has appeared in the Kim Curtis scandal.The second was a belief among some arts and sciences faculty—figures such as Karla Holloway, Anne Allison, Grant Farred, Peter Wood, Houston Baker, Wahneema Lubiano, and Alex Rosenberg, for example—that while all other Duke… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:21 pm
.: Stephen Rosenberg of The McCormack Firm, LLC (Boston) wrote me with the following thoughts which he has given me permission to publish: "Adam [he knows my name is actually Bruce], have long enjoyed your posts (long being a relative term in light of when the age of blogging dawned), but today's post was the first to provoke me to comment. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:57 am
Looks like Steve Rosenberg has been eating his Wheaties. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:10 am
" Today in The Miami Herald, Carol Rosenberg has an article headlined "Panel: Guantanamo captives can't sue in U.S. courts; An appeals panel sided with President Bush and ruled that Guantanamo captives get a military review, not the right to sue in federal court to gain their freedom. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:05 pm
" Carol Rosenberg of The Miami Herald provides a news update headlined "Guantanamo captives can't sue in U.S. courts. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
We have already seen the curious way some Duke professors characterize e-mail, as when Alex Rosenberg stated that I sent him an e-mail accusing him of prejudging the case. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:24 am
Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals, sec. 11.04, 11-20. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 7:20 am
Rosenberg, a Baltimore Democrat and the main sponsor of the House version of the bill. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 9:09 am
Steve Rosenberg writing today in his Boston ERISA and Insurance Litigation Blog ends his post, Insurance Brokers As ERISA Defendents, by commenting that "... it might be something for any entity playing a role in an ERISA governed plan to... [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
And my college classmate was Julius and Ethel Rosenberg's older son.So I read with astonishment the recent panelists' invocation of McCarthyism as their characterization of the criticism they have received for their public statements or writings. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:49 am
" We know you can't do that, because of the Rosenberger v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 5:15 am
Since March 14, compare the behavior of members of the lacrosse team to that of, say, Houston Baker, or Alex Rosenberg, or Wahneema Lubiano, or William Chafe, or Karla Holloway, or Grant Farred. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:16 am
In re Trust of Rosenberg (Rosenberg II), S-05-757, 273 Neb. 59 Nebraska Supreme Court on 2nd appeal See In re Trust of Rosenberg, 269 Neb.310, 693 N.W.2d 500 (2005) (Rosenberg I). between the deceased's second wife and his children over disputed estate assets finds that Wife2 was not allowed to stop payment on the $10k check deceased husband wrote to Wife1 just days before his death, even though Wife2 was a POD on the account. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Your colleague and fellow signatory, Alex Rosenberg, told the New York Sun on October 27 that he signed the ad because he was bothered by "affluent kids violating the law to get exploited women to take their clothes off when they could get as much hookup as they wanted from rich and attractive Duke coeds. [read post]