Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 3421 - 3440 of 3,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The court relied on a recent decision from the Supreme Court of the United States, Kokesh v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
The authority of the decision maker is critical.[15] Cost or pricing data are limited to information a reasonably prudent buyer or seller would expect to affect price negotiations significantly.[16] This is a “reasonable person” standard. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In 1933, the year the Securities Act was enacted, Roosevelt said, “It changes the ancient doctrine of caveat emptor to ‘let the seller beware,’ and puts the burden on the seller rather than on the buyer. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
  An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
Of course, the effectiveness of purported limitations on warranty liability varies from state to state. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am by Gary Nitzkin
He seeks to make it easier to remove foreclosure defense actions from state to federal court, ending state court limited jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:26 am by Edward T. Kang and Kandis Kovalsky
As the number of transactional options continues to grow, so does the risk for potential buyers, sellers, traders and investors. [read post]