Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 3,931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
Smith, which was argued in October.... [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:46 am
The Smith father has no pled facts to qualify as a bystander. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:39 am
†to “Miss Smith, what was the holding in Terry v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
" We also agree with the further contention of defendant that the fact that he received the bargained-for sentence does not preclude him from seeking our discretionary review of his sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (6) (b) (see People v Smith, 32 AD3d 553, 554; see generally People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519-520). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 1:38 pm
Smith. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States (1994) 512 US 594, 599, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 2435; People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
[People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:50 pm
" Video Link The People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
Wiggins v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:49 am
As it rolled, it crossed into the path of a 2001 Honda CR-V driven by 67-year-old Freddie Lee Smith of Dumfries. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 41 (1988) (holding that “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties” (quoting Smith v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:02 pm
But it has its downsides when it comes to the en banc vote, since it's not only people like me who can recognize a panel's particular tilt. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
And that the opinion will seem pretty clearly right as long as you respond to defendant's best argument in a part of the opinion that most people will skim over rather than respond to it directly.This is also, I might add, how bad law gets created. [read post]
