Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2025, 5:50 am
More than a dozen congressional delegations of authority, as described in my 2020 Stanford Law Rev [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
McConnell, a Stanford law professor and former federal appeals judge who is in the case for the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 3:58 pm
Supreme Court, while the other two suggested solutions involve different alternative approaches, including one suggested by Stanford Law Professor Joseph Grundfest. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
A couple of articles were written more or less simultaneously with (and independently from) my article: Kent Greenfield's 2024 article in the American Journal of Law & Equality, and Part III of Taylor Barker's 2024 essay in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:25 am
Rasmussen asserted in The End of Bankruptcy (pdf), an article published in the Stanford Law Review, that improvements in the market for large, public companies had rendered reorganization obsolete. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:56 am
Key Resources: The Four Principles of Purpose-Driven Board Leadership (Anne Wallestad, Stanford Social Innovation Review) Purpose-Driven Board Leadership, Legally Speaking Restatement of the Law: Duty of Loyalty Delegation, Trust, and Reliance Boards may delegate authority to committees, officers, employees, management companies, and others, but board members may not delegate their fiduciary responsibilities. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Reading Keyssar’s new book, the early parts of which I reviewed in manuscript, I found myself thinking about Rawls’s celebrated “veil of ignorance” as one speculative remedy for the frustrating history of Electoral College reform that Keyssar recounts in fascinating if often gloomy detail. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
The Justice Department, for instance, is asking the nine justices to review the constitutionality of a law making it a crime to lie about being a decorated military veteran. [read post]
15 May 2011, 1:34 pm
Resources on the Internet Norman Daniels, Reflective Equilibrium, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 6:50 pm
Resources on the Internet Norman Daniels, Reflective Equilibrium, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
(Ed Whelan (National Review Online) sets forth the argument, but others — such as liberal Stanford Law School Dean Larry Kramer — have taken the same view, as have other scholars; see, e.g., pp. 1031-33 of this article, which briefly discuss Kramer’s and other scholars’ views.) [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
Panel 1: 1201 and 1202 Moderator: Jennifer Stisa Granick, Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society Quick overview of 1201 and 1202: primary prohibitions in 1201, with specific statutory exceptions and an exemption procedure done through triennial rulemaking. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
These exclusionist laws presented no constitutional problems. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
So there is a question of legitimacy about the institution of judicial review. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Kristen SondayThese results were compiled by Kristen Sonday, cofounder and COO of legal tech startup Paladin, a pro bono management platform, with assistance from the CodeX team at Stanford Law School and Pieter Gunst, cofounder and CEO of Legal.io. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
During this time, he went on to be a law review editor and managed to win a Supreme Court clerkship. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
Many experts will review the same pieces of scientific evidence and reach different conclusions on these issues. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
Frankel quotes Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest as saying that there “is no such thing” as a federal derivative action under Section 14(a). [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:30 am
If the laws on our books are inadequate to prevent such an oil spill, or if we didn't enforce those laws - I want to know it. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:21 pm
They have the potential to become legitimate centers of authority to which the law - as with corporations - ought to defer. [read post]
