Search for: "State Bar Association v. State"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 9,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 11:04 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a lengthy opinion today vacated or remanded significant parts of the Department of Education (DOE)’s signature Higher Education Act (HEA) regulations in Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
State ex rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
Little v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
In UMG Recordings v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
The judge stated that he was entering a default on punitive damages for which he found a violation. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
CEQA Significance Thresholds California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
The district court referred a copy of the order to the California Bar Association, and new counsel was appointed for Mr. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:06 am
Marine Corps v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 10:00 pm
Among the organizations calling for legislation to address subject matter eligibility interpretation is the American Bar Association Intellectual Property Law Section (Letter of March 28, 2017), the Intellectual Property Owners group (IPO Daily News, January 2017) and the American Intellectual Property Law Association AIPLA (May 2017). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
The Dade County Bar Association awarded Lobree its Alan R. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:48 am
On Wednesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will rehear Brackeen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:34 am
Parino v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
Second, the plaintiffs argued that the Supreme Court implicitly overruled Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning in Griffin in two subsequent Supreme Court decisions, Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
For one thing, failure-to-recall claims are barred by the state of the art defense: [N]o common law duty exists. . .requiring a manufacturer to recall a product after the product has left the manufacturer’s control. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
For one thing, failure-to-recall claims are barred by the state of the art defense: [N]o common law duty exists. . .requiring a manufacturer to recall a product after the product has left the manufacturer’s control. [read post]
