Search for: "State v House"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 28,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am
It could not be said in this case that the enquiries made were such that no reasonable housing authority could have been satisfied as to their scope and scale, R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, ex p Bayani (1990) 22 H.L.R. 406. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:22 am
Supreme Court rules on another arbitration-related case, Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am
Many states have their own drug laws, but federal drug laws supplant state laws, even in states where marijuana has been made legal for medical or recreational purposes. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Will the House follow suit? [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:46 am
Addressing some of the issues raised in Epic Games v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 8:34 am
From Doe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In the non-precedential case of Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
A family house likely will grow in value, and that value can be captured as a property tax by states. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 1:39 pm
United States (Tribal Police; Tribal Law and Order Act) Hawk v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
In response to the violence, the government declared a state of emergency, which will last for 30 days. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am
Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify Links discussed in this episode: “Google LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:23 am
ShareThe Supreme Court heard argument on Monday in LeDure v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am
To take one random example, see Johnson v Unisys [2013] 1 AC 518, in which the House of Lords held that it was not permissible to bring a common law claim for breach of contract which would sidestep the restrictions on the statutory unfair dismissal regime. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 7:38 am
From Judge Lee Rudofsky's opinion denying summary judgment, yesterday's Long v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
In this case, a majority of the House of Lords ruled that a very open-ended grant of emergency powers by Parliament authorised the executive to deprive individuals of liberty without due process on grounds of the national interest, or, though the judges did not use this expression, on grounds of “reason of state”. [read post]
Justices add three new cases, including challenge to animal-welfare law and Warhol copyright dispute
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
ShareIn Torres v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
