Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 157,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:19 am
" See also State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
United States, by Kristin A. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
These cases cover the rights of criminal defendants, the rights of free speech and free exercise of religion, and the powers of states. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 8:23 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 3:20 pm
"Whether a federal statute preempts state law is a question of law for the court to decide. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Some states like California and Texas have passed laws restricting the use of information from a swiped driver's license. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:55 pm
Abouselman (Water Rights)United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:50 am
"Law School takes part in Court case; Supreme Court Litigation Clinic to represent petitioner in Abbott v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer: Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:25 am
On May 23, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Wittman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
The case of Farmer-Paellmann v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:26 am
In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
And Dean Bernard Dobranski has publicly stated that AMSL is ‘not a seminary. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 12:40 pm
(Section 1983; Bivens; Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA)) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Lake County v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:12 am
United States [docket]. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:33 pm
The court reaffirmed the 2002 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Mackin v New Brunswick, which held that the state only has limited immunity. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
For better or for worse : The court's application of the second Montana Exception to United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
