Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 3421 - 3440
of 29,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 8:51 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
BeckonEmployee Blogging RisksEmployee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim -- Barnett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
Jurisdictional classification, position classification and determining the compensation to be paid individuals in the State’s “civil service” DeMartino v City of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 22178, Supreme Court, New York County The City of New York promulgated Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2 that approve and resulted in an amendment to Rule X of the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the City of New York. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am
” Judge Kavanaugh’s 10-page opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
DAVID MORTIMER (A-11-93) (NOTE: This is a companion case to State v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:41 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 5:15 pm
You can view the entire Samsung v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
-EV]Part I of this series placed Texas v. [read post]
