Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 3421 - 3440 of 6,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
 And who on planet Earth would ever think up a question like this, if it wasn't for the persistent attempts of the CJEU and Europe's finest IP lawyers to categorise confusion as a state of law rather than as a state of fact?]. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
   A recent study reported that “parents experienced long-term emotional distress and substantive disruption to family and daily life” following an E. coli O157:H7 infection in the family.[40] B. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
   A recent study reported that “parents experienced long-term emotional distress and substantive disruption to family and daily life” following an E. coli O157:H7 infection in the family.[40] B. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:09 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the employees were granted partial summary judgment on their state law claim that the surcharge was a tip under the NYLL following the effective date of the 2011 Regulations (Maldonado v BTB Events & Celebrations, Inc, November 22, 2013, Engelmayer, P). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Greeley Anesthesia Services, P.C., 961 P.2d 520 (Colo.Ct.App. 1998); see generally, Restatement (Second) Contracts §356 (comment b); 22 Am.Jur.2d Damages Secs. 683, 686, 690, 693, 703). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:18 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: SHELLEY MOORE v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am by Glenn
That competition concern harkens all the way back to United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:24 am by Guest Blogger
Like a drop of water, an e-record is dependent upon its ERMS (its “pool”) for its: (a) existence; (b) accessibility; and, (c) its integrity. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:07 am by WSLL
Case Name: MERIT ENERGY COMPANY v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
 for participation, by an act occurred in another Member State (Member State B), in violation of trade mark rights committed in the first Member State (Member State A )? [read post]