Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 36,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2025, 6:22 am
Consumers’ Research, and SHLB Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:45 pm
US Bank National Assoc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE VII If a fugitive criminal claimed by one of the parties hereto, shall be also claimed by one or more powers pursuant to treaty provisions, on account of crimes or offenses committed within their jurisdiction, such criminal shall be delivered to that State whose demand is first received unless its demand is waived. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
” Sotomayor asked why states should have the power to remove candidates from their ballots, to which Murray explained that Article II gives states the power to “appoint their own electors as they see fit. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Borough of Cliffside Park v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 7:02 am
In Power of Grace, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am
The Estate Of Marc Palotay et al v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
" Pierce v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
But Congress has that power, and the states (and their local government subdivisions) do not. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
State of M.P., AIR 1954 SC 465] and control of import and export [Bhatnagars & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Sure, you could adopt a contrary regulation, but that's up to the state. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Along with Van Cleve, I also assigned Federalist 40, written by Madison, in which Madison defends, plausibly or not, the extraordinarily powers seized by the Framers in Philadelphia when measured against both the rather limited mandate of Congress--to suggest "revisions" in the Articles of Confederation--and, more importantly, the constraints of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which required the assent of the legislatures of every one of the states… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
The case name is Guarscio v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:40 am
(EDNY, decided 3/25/2009) The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York has again ruled that the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of Congress's commerce powers. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Rhoades v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:45 pm
But in recent years, the Board has belatedly asserted the extraordinary power to regulate the on-reservation activities of sovereign Indian tribes, precipitating a three-way circuit split in the process. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Partially tribal land: The case for limiting state eminent domain power under 25 USC 357. [read post]
