Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 3421 - 3440 of 7,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Slattery https://t.co/HVwCG11vor -> When words mean what they say: Bob Marley copyrights stay where they are https://t.co/7J541q5DxM -> Austria's highest court mulls class action status for Schrems v Facebook https://t.co/YtgRLzFp4z -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-11-22: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-11-21: Computer an… https://t.co/HTYYbAhWBv -> Hospital clerk fined $36,000 for selling patient records https://t.co/8Yl90bliZE -> Third… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
A couple of interesting things caught my eye about an otherwise garden-variety lawsuit brought by a dissident LLC member in which Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" And so, "absent agreement or other definitive obligation, this State, as opposed to some others does not hold a child liable for the support of his or her parent. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If you have a similar case scenario, you will need the help of a Nassau Family Attorney and Nassau Order of Protection Attorney at Stephen Bilkis and Associates. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:23 pm by Howard Friedman
A proposed order has been filed by plaintiffs in A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Center v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:23 pm
Concisely stated, it is the contract, and not the will, which is irrevocable (see, 38 NY Jur 2d, Decedents' Estates, § 324; see also, Glass v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 November 2015, HHJ Stephen Davies handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Ragozzino [2015] EWHC 3232 (QB). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
There is nothing in the language of the Sterling National Bank v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Stephens 15-187Issue: (1) Whether a federal court of appeals is authorized to review sua sponte and invalidate an order reopening the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6), when the appellee never appealed the order; (2) whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]