Search for: "State v. Tell"
Results 3421 - 3440
of 20,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Criminal Defense Lawyers Are Required to Tell Client of Deportation Risk Before Entering Guilty Plea
22 Jun 2011, 9:25 am
At Shorstein & Lasnetski, we handle immigration cases as well as criminal cases so, unlike most other criminal lawyers in the Jacksonville, Florida area, we are qualified to fully advise you if you are not a United States citizen and are facing criminal charges., In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Padilla v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
UNITED STATES V. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:41 am
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 11:16 am
In Giles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
See Field v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:00 am
The recent Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
(In truth, you can tell from the footnotes that Judge Kozinski's not entirely sure that's right, but he concedes -- at least for purposes of argument -- that's perhaps true; he instead holds that it's irrelevant. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
Supreme Court tell state supreme courts that those courts are wrong in saying what their own law is? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Yesterday the SCOTUS handed down the long-awaited decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:39 am
(At least, that’s what the 1st District held six weeks ago in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
Seemingly more important, in the eyes of the Court, was the canon that state tax exemptions should be construed narrowly to minimize federal interference with state tax regimes, provided in California State Board of Equalization v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
(Cites to Erie, State Farm). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Our nomination for the most intriguing case of the last Supreme Court term is Mallory v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Ontario v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
(Though the rest, as far as I can tell, is correct. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
But as far as their court systems go, you don't necessarily have the same quality control as you do in the traditional fifty states. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:58 am
Particularly since the California Supreme Court doesn't do a very good job of telling the trial courts how much to weigh such comments, and merely states that they should be viewed "in the totality" of the case and with all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:52 am
What is awful is that the ACLU is telling lies and the public seems to be buying it, never mind the facts of the case or the lack of merit to the ACLU claims. [read post]
