Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Max Clifford and Gordon Taylor have already sued the News of the World and Glenn Mulcaire for damages and reportedly settled their claims for very substantial damages. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
That doctrine, under the current law, had arisen in two previous English cases, Rotocrop International Ltd v Genbourne Ltd [1982] FSR 241 and Lacroix Duarib SA v Kwikform (UK) Ltd [1998] FSR 493. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:23 am
Disciplinary proceedures set out in a collective bargaining agreement trumped the Civil Service Commission’s probationary termination rulesGordon v Town of Queensbury, App. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
Protecting health insurance benefits after retirementRocco v City of Schenectady, App. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:01 am by Georgetown Law Journal
Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 99.1 (November 2010) Articles The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 10:32 am
I love the brownish-bronze belt and the single chunky bracelet.* * *You may already own a long buttoned cardigan similar to this Ann Taylor light heather grey Merino V-Neck Cardigan. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Social Media - its use by employers in pre-employment, employment and post-employment situationsSource: Article by Eileen Morgan Johnson, Esq. of Whiteford, Taylor Preston [emjohnson@wtplaw.com ]. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:48 pm by Narendra Ghosh
The North Carolina Supreme Court denied the defendants’ petition for discretionary review (PDR) in Taylor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
The City of Plattsburgh and its police officers union agreed while negotiating their 1995-1998 Taylor Law contract to include a provision -- referred to as the “207-c benefits” -- in the agreement. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:46 am
In 1993, the Union-Endicott Maintenance Workers Association filed an improper employer practice charge with PERB contending that the district had awarded work previously performed exclusively by Association members to an independent contractor in violation of Section 209-a(1)(d) of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law].PERB agreed and directed the district to cease subcontracting out the work and to make the Association members “whole for any wages or benefits lost as a result of the… [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:24 am
Section 205(5)(d) places limits PERB’s authority and PERB does not have jurisdiction with respect to (a) enforcing the terms of an agreement between the parties, nor (b) considering alleged violations of a Taylor Law agreement.Reinstating the ruling by the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals held that the district had violated the “unambiguous” terms of the Taylor Law agreement between the parties. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: Below is today's tort law Appellate Court opinion: AC30655 - Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
Statute of limitations for filing Section 75 disciplinary chargesWade v Ticonderoga Town Board, 256 AD2d 860, motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 804Section 75 disciplinary charges were brought against John K. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:03 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiff claimed that his regularly scheduled Narcotics Anonymous class was combined with Christian religious services and he was required to attend and submit a written summary of what he learned from the Christian speaker.In Taylor v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]