Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION" Results 3421 - 3440 of 23,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm by Wells Bennett
One of those administrative functions is transcribing commission proceedings and preparing the record of trial. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:12 pm
  Here are some details: The Kentucky County Judge/Executives Association and 110 fiscal courts filed the suit Friday in Franklin Circuit Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
  Mick has broad trial experience, both jury and non-jury, before state and federal civil courts and before administrative agencies that regulate employment. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:59 am by Gallivan & Gallivan
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department partly affirmed and partly reversed a trial court order for summary judgment in an action for medical malpractice. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:51 am by Scott Koller
The trial court held that the proper standard of review was de novo and sought to address the case on the merits. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:13 pm
The ongoing administration of the trust necessarily involved circumstances that the trial court's order on review in effect ignores. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Sept. 9, 2013), a different state trial court held that the break-away Anglican Diocese holds title to the bank account and administrative offices of the Diocese. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:09 am by Allan Blutstein
FDA concerns a journalist who requested clinical trial data from the Food and Drug Administration related to its approval of a drug. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:54 pm by Dennis Crouch
That decision vacated and remanded for the matter to be decided by a new panel of Administrative Patent Judges (“APJs”) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board after this court concluded that the APJs’ appointments violated the Appointments Clause. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:50 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Stier (child custody)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: City of Duluth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 7:36 am by Docket Navigator
Following a bench trial, the court found that plaintiff's ophthalmic drug patents were invalid as obvious and found that plaintiff's evidence of commercial success and long-felt need were insufficient secondary considerations of nonobviousness to overcome the court's obviousness determination because of plaintiff's blocking patents. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:09 am by Eileen McDermott
In Arthrex, the Federal Circuit found that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) were unconstitutionally appointed and removed the civil service protections they previously were deemed to enjoy—although, as Professor John Duffy of the University of Virginia School of Law pointed out, if the Federal Circuit ruled that the APJs can’t have tenure, that arguably means they never did. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Court (with Justice Rehnquist not taking part due to a prior role in the Nixon administration) ruled against the President. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:58 am by Levin Papantonio
District Court judges, creates an MD for these lawsuits, the district court to which the MDL is assigned would oversee all the administrative aspects of and all pretrial motions for the consolidated case. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
There has been a superabundant deluge of patent cases last week, with two decisions from the Court of Appeal and two from the Patents Court. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:14 pm by John Floyd
  The appeals court was particularly critical of the trial court for not being able to provide any reasons after the detailed inquiry that its denial of the motion to withdraw was necessary to the fair, efficient, and orderly administration of justice. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:15 am by Adam Santucci
  The trial court agreed, holding that speech on behalf of the union and association with the union were not constitutionally protected conduct. [read post]