Search for: "The City of Jackson" Results 3421 - 3432 of 3,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
Hearing Jackson, Feb. 3-7, 1997. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
In a later opinion dealing with discrimination against Mexican-Americans in Texas, Justice Powell went out of his way to note that the conduct in question had been approved not only by a Mexican-American majority city council, but also by a Mexican-American district judge. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:55 pm
Most significant, it failed to address the terror bombing of civilians and the deliberate consuming of whole cities (Dresden, Tokyo) by fire -- the most enthusiastic practitioners of the latter being the Allies.The failure to prosecute the Allies for firebombing cities is one of the strongest arguments today for why war-crimes tribunals should not be conducted by the victors. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 2:20 pm
In the past year, the cities have included Prague, Brussels, London, DC and Montreal. [read post]
17 Apr 2006, 4:20 pm
With this addition, Adams and Reese will have 10 offices in nine cities: Memphis and Nashville, TN; New Orleans and Baton Rouge, LA; Birmingham and Mobile, AL; Houston, TX; Jackson, MS; and Washington, DC. [read post]
17 Apr 2006, 4:20 pm
With this addition, Adams and Reese will have 10 offices in nine cities: Memphis and Nashville, TN; New Orleans and Baton Rouge, LA; Birmingham and Mobile, AL; Houston, TX; Jackson, MS; and Washington, DC. [read post]
23 Nov 2005, 12:46 am
"Kern denied Presson's and Jackson's request to confirm their reappointment to represent Scott Allen Hain for his clemency hearing. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 5:22 pm
John's John Barrett (a classmate of mine from HLS '86, who is a leading scholar of Robert Jackson and the Nuremberg trial), here, that today is the 60th anniversary of Robert Jackson's (pictured right) opening statement at Nuremberg. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 10:20 am
City of Jackson [case backgrounder from Duke Law School], ruling that workers over the age of 40 need not show proof of discriminatory intent in lawsuits brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act [text]. [read post]